How long to conduct your experiment: Talk at ASEBP

Upcoming at the American Society of Evidence Based Policing Conference, I have a talk Thursday morning (9:45-10:00), How long to conduct your experiment.

The talk goes over some of the simple metrics I have created to help plan how long to conduct your intervention. Such as how long to evaluate your hot spots intervention, or purchase to increase arrest rates, etc.

I have prepared a ton of different resources. The main one is a web-based application (a WASM-based app with R as the backend) where you can enter your inputs and generate a graph showing how precise your parameter estimates are:

The help page includes citations and additional materials, but here is a brief rundown:

  • I have the math details in this github repo, see the methodology.pdf. It also includes notes on how I used different LLM tools to produce the webpage and the method materials. Each of the applications allows you to download the R code used to generate the graphs and tables.

  • I have created a series of YouTube videos demonstrating the application (WDD, IRR, Proportion tests)

  • I have posted my slides for the ASEBP talk

See you all in DC at ASEBP in a few weeks!

Gathering interest in tech courses

Quick post this morning — I have a survey up gathering input on interest in short, technical courses.

Think 2-3 days, potentially in person/synchronous.

If you have taken a course with Paul Allison at Horizon’s, or an ICPSR summer course, those are similar examples. But, the main difference will be these courses are to prepare you for pursuing private sector roles.

These will be aimed at:

  • grad level social science students
  • current professors looking to pursue private sector roles
  • current data analysts looking to get into data science
  • undergrads with some more technical background

Survey lists potential courses (python for data analysis, intro to LLM APIs, SQL + Dashboards, using agent based tools for analysis), the course medium (in person vs video), price points.

If you are a university or organization interested in hosting such sessions for your students, let me know as well. Happy to chat to you about bringing this to your campus.

Job Advice Resources page

Minor update, I have created a page, Job Advice Resources to cumulatively list all the materials I have written on advice for social scientists and crime analysts looking to pivot into private sector tech roles.

I still get maybe ~2 folks a month ask for advice, and I am always happy to chat. I wish PhD granting institutions took this more seriously (it only takes minor changes to better prepare students).

If you are an administrator of a PhD program and actually care about getting your students jobs, also feel free to reach out and I am happy to discuss how I can help.

Policing Scholars should join ASEBP

Cross-posted on my Crime De-Coder blog.

I will be giving a talk at the upcoming American Society of Evidence Based Policing (ASEBP) conference (registration link here, May 20th-22nd in DC). My talk is How long to conduct your experiment? Check it out Thursday morning – I specifically asked for one of the short talks; 15 minutes is plenty to get the gist.

ASEBP Conference Flyer, 2026 in DC

I will be sharing a web-app to go with the talk soon (you can see my WDD tool and this blog post for background), but wanted to write a more general post about why researchers (as well as police officers who are interested in professionalization of the field) should join ASEBP.

To start, I have been involved in various ways with ASEBP for several years now, but I do not have any financial ties to ASEBP. I currently volunteer on the committee that reviews conference talks.

ASEBP is clearly the best organization for policing scholars currently in the country. The other main criminological societies (the American Society of Criminology and the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences) are operating much as they did 30 years ago. Mostly they only exist to run journals and have a yearly conference where anyone can give a talk. They are incredibly insular, and have basically zero input from practitioners.

You can go and just look at the talks for ASC and ACJS – they are basically irrelevant to the vast majority of criminal justice operations (not only in policing, but in the CJ field as a whole). You can go look at the talks for the ASEBP conference and see they have a much clearer focus on realistic topics police departments are interested in, but presented by legitimate researchers and practitioners.

For scholars, I have developed working relationships with departments through multiple police practitioners I have met through ASEBP – and I hope to make more!

ASEBP was started by Renee Mitchell with a clear goal in mind – Renee is really the modern-day version of August Vollmer. ASEBP is intended to be a rigorous (unlike ASC, which allows almost anyone to present) conference and organization (ASEBP has training opportunities as well) to advance the use of evidence in policing operations.

If you think “I am not a policing researcher”, but have anything to do at all with criminal justice, feel free to get in touch. (Crime analysts should definitely join.) I have ideas to expand the organization – nothing equivalent currently exists in other parts of the criminal justice system as well. Being evidence-based is really the core of what Renee and everyone else is building.

If you are going to the conference and want to meet up, feel free to send me an email, andrew.wheeler@crimede-coder.com, and I will find a time to get a coffee while we are in DC.

Interview on LEAP about LLMs for Mortals

I was recently interviewed by Jason Elder on the Law Enforcement Analysts Podcast about my new book, Large Language Models for Mortals: A Practical Guide for Analysts.

Jason does an excellent job with interviewing (and does a quality editing job with audio), so suggest to follow that if you are a crime analyst or researcher working with police departments.

Basically cover large swaths of the book, through basics of APIs, structured info extraction, some high level discussion of RAG, and how AI coding tools still need a bit of human oversight and direction. Even if you are not a coder, I think picking up a copy is a good idea to get an understanding about what is possible with the current tools.

Just to catalog the different coupon codes for the book:

  • LLMDEVS to get 50% off of the epub
  • TWOFOR1 to get $30 off when purchasing two books (can be any two books)

I do give the first coupon code for the paperback version of the book in the interview. So take a listen if interested in $20 off the paperback.

You can purchase either epub or paperback from my store worldwide.

Large Language Models for Mortals book

I have published a new book, Large Language Models for Mortals: A Practical Guide for Analysts with Python. The book is available to purchase in my store, either as a paperback (for $59.99) or an epub (for $49.99).

The book is a tutorial on using python with all the major LLM foundation model providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and AWS Bedrock). The book goes through the basics of API calls, structured outputs, RAG applications, and tool-calling/MCP/agents. The book also has a chapter on LLM coding tools, with example walk throughs for GitHub Copilot, Claude Code (including how to set it up via AWS Bedrock), and Google’s Antigravity editor. (It also has a few examples of local models, which you can see Chapter 2 I discuss them before going onto the APIs in Chapter 3).

You can review the first 60 some pages (PDF link here if on Iphone).

While many of the examples in the book are criminology focused, such as extracting out crime elements from incident narratives, or summarizing time series charts, the lessons are more general and are relevant to anyone looking to learn the LLM APIs. I say “analyst” in the title, but this is really relevant to:

  • traditional data scientists looking to expand into LLM applications
  • PhD students (in all fields) who would like to use LLM applications in their work
  • analysts looking to process large amounts of unstructured textual data

Basically anyone who wants to build or create LLM applications, this is the book to help you get started.

I wrote this book partially out of fear – the rapid pace of LLM development has really upended my work as a data scientist. It is really becoming the most important set of skills (moreso than traditional predictive machine learning) in just the past year or two. This book is the one I wish I had several years ago, and will give analysts a firm grounding in using LLMs in realistic applications.

Again, the book is available in:

For purchase worldwide. Here are all the sections in the book – whether you are an AWS or Google shop, or want to learn the different database alternatives for RAG, or want more self contained examples of agents with python code examples for OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google, this should be a resource you highly consider purchasing.

To come are several more blog posts in the near future, how I set up Claude Code to help me write (and not sound like a robot). How to use conformal inference and logprobs to set false positive rates for classification with LLM models, and some pain points with compiling a Quarto book with stochastic outputs (and points of varying reliability for each of the models).

But for now, just go and purchase the book!


Below is the table of contents to review – it is over 350 pages for the print version (in letter paper), over 250 python code snippets and over 80 screenshots.

Large Language Models for Mortals: A Practical Guide for Analysts with Python
by Andrew Wheeler
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface
Are LLMs worth all the hype?
Is this book more AI Slop?
Who this book is for
Why write this book?
What this book covers
What this book is not
My background
Materials for the book
Feedback on the book
Thank you
1 Basics of Large Language Models
1.1 What is a language model?
1.2 A simple language model in PyTorch
1.3 Defining the neural network
1.4 Training the model
1.5 Testing the model
1.6 Recapping what we just built
2 Running Local Models from Hugging Face
2.1 Installing required libraries
2.2 Downloading and using Hugging Face models
2.3 Generating embeddings with sentence transformers
2.4 Named entity recognition with GLiNER
2.5 Text Generation
2.6 Practical limitations of local models
3 Calling External APIs
3.1 GUI applications vs API access
3.2 Major API providers
3.3 Calling the OpenAI API
3.4 Controlling the Output via Temperature
3.5 Reasoning
3.6 Multi-turn conversations
3.7 Understanding the internals of responses
3.8 Embeddings
3.9 Inputting different file types
3.10 Different providers, same API
3.11 Calling the Anthropic API
3.12 Using extended thinking with Claude
3.13 Inputting Documents and Citations
3.14 Calling the Google Gemini API
3.15 Long Context with Gemini
3.16 Grounding in Google Maps
3.17 Audio Diarization
3.18 Video Understanding
3.19 Calling the AWS Bedrock API
3.20 Calculating costs
4 Structured Output Generation
4.1 Prompt Engineering
4.2 OpenAI with JSON parsing
4.3 Assistant Messages and Stop Sequences
4.4 Ensuring Schema Matching Using Pydantic
4.5 Batch Processing For Structured Data Extraction using OpenAI
4.6 Anthropic Batch API
4.7 Google Gemini Batch
4.8 AWS Bedrock Batch Inference
4.9 Testing
4.10 Confidence in Classification using LogProbs
4.11 Alternative inputs and outputs using XML and YAML
4.12 Structured Workflows with Structured Outputs
5 Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
5.1 Understanding embeddings
5.2 Generating Embeddings using OpenAI
5.3 Example Calculating Cosine similarity and L2 distance
5.4 Building a simple RAG system
5.5 Re-ranking for improved results
5.6 Semantic vs Keyword Search
5.7 In-memory vector stores
5.8 Persistent vector databases
5.9 Chunking text from PDFs
5.10 Semantic Chunking
5.11 OpenAI Vector Store
5.12 AWS S3 Vectors
5.13 Gemini and BigQuery SQL with Vectors
5.14 Evaluating retrieval quality
5.15 Do you need RAG at all?
6 Tool Calling, Model Context Protocol (MCP), and Agents
6.1 Understanding tool calling
6.2 Tool calling with OpenAI
6.3 Multiple tools and complex workflows
6.4 Tool calling with Gemini
6.5 Returning images from tools
6.6 Using the Google Maps tool
6.7 Tool calling with Anthropic
6.8 Error handling and model retry
6.9 Tool Calling with AWS Bedrock
6.10 Introduction to Model Context Protocol (MCP)
6.11 Connecting Claude Desktop to MCP servers
6.12 Examples of Using the Crime Analysis Server in Claude Desktop
6.13 What are Agents anyway?
6.14 Using Multiple Tools with the OpenAI Agents SDK
6.15 Composing and Sequencing Agents with the Google Agents SDK
6.16 MCP and file searching using the Claude Agents SDK
6.17 LLM as a Judge
7 Coding Tools and AI-Assisted Development
7.1 Keeping it real with vibe coding
7.2 VS Code and GitHub Install
7.3 GitHub Copilot
7.4 Claude Code Setup
7.5 Configuring API access
7.6 Using Claude Code to Edit Files
7.7 Project context with CLAUDE.md
7.8 Using an MCP Server
7.9 Custom Commands and Skills
7.10 Session Management
7.11 Hooks for Testing
7.12 Claude Headless Mode
7.13 Google Antigravity
7.14 Best practices for AI-assisted coding
8 Where to next?
8.1 Staying current
8.2 What to learn next?
8.3 Forecasting the near future of foundation models
8.4 Final thoughts

Part time product design positions to help with AI companies

Recently on the Crime Analysis sub-reddit an individual posted about working with an AI product company developing a tool for detectives or investigators.

The Mercor platform has many opportunities that may be of interest to my network, so I am sharing them here. These include not only for investigators, but GIS analysts, writers, community health workers, etc. (The eligibility interviewers I think if you had any job in gov services would likely qualify, it is just reviewing questions.)

All are part time (minimum of 15 hours per week), remote, and can be in the US, Canada, or UK. (But cannot support H1-B or OPT visas in the US).

Additional for professionals looking to get into the tech job market, see these two resources:

I actually just hired my first employee at Crime De-Coder. Always feel free to reach out if you think you would be a good fit for the types of applications I am working on (python, GIS, crime analysis experience). I will put you in the list to reach out to when new opportunities are available.


Detectives and Criminal Investigators

Referral Link

$65-$115 hourly

Mercor is recruiting Detectives and Criminal Investigators to work on a research project for one of the world’s top AI companies. This project involves using your professional experience to design questions related to your occupation as a Detective and Criminal Investigator. Applicants must:

  • Have 4+ years full-time work experience in this occupation;
  • Be based in the US, UK, or Canada
  • minimum of 15 hours per week

Community Health Workers

Referral Link

$60-$80 hourly

Mercor is recruiting Community Health Workers to work on a research project for one of the world’s top AI companies. This project involves using your professional experience to design questions related to your occupation as a Community Health Worker. Applicants must:

  • Have 4+ years full-time work experience in this occupation;
  • Be based in the US, UK, or Canada
  • minimum 15 hours per week

Writers and Authors

Referral Link

$60-$95 hourly

Mercor is recruiting Writers and Authors to work on a research project for one of the world’s top AI companies. This project involves using your professional experience to design questions related to your occupation as a Writer and Author.

Applicants must:

  • Have 4+ years full-time work experience in this occupation;
  • Be based in the US, UK, or Canada
  • minimum 15 hours per week

Eligibility Interviewers, Government Programs

Referral Link

$60-$80 hourly

Mercor is recruiting Eligibility Interviewers, Government Programs to work on a research project for one of the world’s top AI companies. This project involves using your professional experience to design questions related to your occupation as a Eligibility Interviewers, Government Program. Applicants must:

  • Have 4+ years full-time work experience in this occupation;
  • Be based in the US, UK, or Canada
  • minimum 15 hours per week

Cartographers and Photogrammetrists

Referral Link

$60-$105 hourly

Mercor is recruiting Cartographers and Photogrammetrists to work on a research project for one of the world’s top AI companies. This project involves using your professional experience to design questions related to your occupation as a Cartographer and Photogrammetrist. Applicants must:

  • Have 4+ years full-time work experience in this occupation;
  • Be based in the US, UK, or Canada
  • minimum 15 hours per week

Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers

$85-$100 hourly

Referral Link

Mercor is recruiting Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers to work on a research project for one of the world’s top AI companies. This project involves using your professional experience to design questions related to your occupation as a Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers Applicants must:

  • Have 4+ years full-time work experience in this occupation;
  • Be based in the US, UK, or Canada
  • minimum of 15 hours per week

Year in Review 2025 and AI Predictions

For a brief year in review, total views for the two different websites have decreased in the past year. For this blog, I am going to be a few thousand shy of 100,000 views. (2023 I had over 150k views, and 2024 I had over 140k views.) For the Crime De-Coder site, I am going to only get around 15k views.

Part of it is I posted less, this will be the 21st blog post this year on the personal blog (2023 had 46 and 2024 had 32 posts). The Crime De-Coder site had 12 blog posts, so pretty consistent with the prior year. Both are pretty bursty, with large bouts of traffic coming from if I post something to Hacker News I can get 1k to 10k views in a day or two if it makes it to the front page. So the 2024 stats for the crime de-coder was a few of those Hacker News bumps I did not get in 2025.

Some of it could legitimately be traditional Google search being usurped by the gen AI tools. This is the first year I had appreciable referrals from chatgpt, but they are less than 1000. The other tools are trivial amount of referrals. If I worried about SEO more, I would have more updating/regular content (as old pages are devalued quite a bit by google, and it seems to be getting more severe over time).

I have upped my use of the free tools quite a bit. ChatGPT knows me pretty well, and I use Claude Desktop almost every day as well.

An IAM policy scroll is more of a nightmare, and I definitely ask more python questions than R, but the cartoon desk is pretty close to spot on. I am close to paying for Anthropic subscription for Claude code credits (currently use pay as I go via Bedrock, and this is the first month I went over $20).

What pages on the blog are popular I can never be sure of. My most popular post last year was Downloading Police Employment Trends from the FBI Data Explorer. A 2023 post, that had random times where it would have several hundred visits in a short hour span. (Some bot collecting sites? I do not know.) If it is actual people, you would want to check out my Sworn Dashboard site, where you can look at trends for PDs much easier than downloading all the data yourself!

One thing that has grown though, I do short form posting on LinkedIn on my crime de-coder page. Impressions total for the year is over 340k (see the graph), and I currently am a few shy of 4400 followers.

LinkedIn is nice because it can be slightly longer form than the other social media sites. I would suggest you follow me there (in addition to signing up for RSS feeds for the two sites). That is the easiest way to follow my work.

I also took over as a moderator of the Crime Analysis Reddit forum, it is better than the IACA forums in my opinion, so encourage folks to post there for crime analysis questions.

Crime De-Coder Work

Crime De-Coder work has been steady (but not increasing). Similar to last year had several consulting gigs conducting crime analysis for premises liability cases (and one other case I may share my opinions once it is over), and doing some small projects with non-profits and police departments.

One big project was a python training in Austin.

The Python Book (which I also translated to Spanish/French), had a trickle of new sales. 2024 had around 100 sales and 2025 had around 50 sales. It is close to 2/3 print sales and 1/3 epub, so definately folks should have physical prints if you are selling books still.

Doing trainings basically makes writing the book worth it, but I do hope eventually the book makes it way into grad school curriculum’s. (Only one course so far.) I have pitched to grad schools to have me run a similar bootcamp to what I do for crime analysts, so if interested let me know.

The biggest new thing was Crime De-Coder got an Arnold Grant. Working with Denver PD on an experiment to evaluate a chronic offender initiative.

At the Day Gig

At my day gig, I was officially promoted to a senior manager and then quickly to a director position. Hence you get posts like what to show in your tech resume and notes on project management.

One of the reasons I am big on python – it is the dominant programming language in data science. It is hard for me to recruit from my network, as majority of individuals just know a little R (if you were a hard core R person, had packages/well executed public repo’s, I could more easily think you will be able to migrate to python to work on my team).

So learn python if you want to be a data scientist is my advice (and see other job market advice at my archived newsletter).

AI Predictions

At the day gig, my work went from 100% traditional supervised machine learning models to more like 50/50 traditional vs generative AI applications. The genAI hype is real, but I think it is worthwhile putting my thoughts to paper.

The biggest question is will AI take all of our jobs? I think a more likely end scenario is the AI tools just become better at helping humans do tasks. The leap from helping a human do something faster vs an AI tool doing it 100% on its own with 0 human input is hard. The models are getting incrementally better, but I think to fully replace people in a substantive way will require another big advancement in fundamental capabilities. Making a human 10x more productive is easier and still will make the AI companies a ton of money.

Sometimes people view the 10x idea and say that will take jobs, just not 100% of jobs. That is a view though that there is only a finite amount of work to be done. That assumption is clearly not true, and being able to do work faster/cheaper just induces demand for more potential work. The example with calculators making more banking jobs, not less, is basically the same example.

One of the critiques of the current systems is they are overvalued, so we are in a bubble. I do not remember where I read it, but one estimate was if everyone in the US spent $1 a day on the different AI tools, that would justify the current valuations for OpenAI, Anthropic, NVIDIA, etc. I think that is totally doable, we spend a few thousand a workday at Gainwell on the foundation models for example for a few projects, and we are just going to continue to roll out more and more. Gainwell is a company with around 6k employees for reference, and our current AI applications touch way less than 1k of those employees. We have plenty of room to grow those applications.

It is super hard though to build systems to help people do things faster. And we are talking like “this thing that used to take 30 minutes now takes 15 minutes”. If you have 100 people doing that thing all the time though, the costs of the models are low enough it is an easy win.

And this mostly only holds true for knowledge economy work that can be all done via software. There just still needs to be fundamental improvements to robotics to be able to do physical things. The tailor’s job is safe for the foreseeable future.

The change in the data science landscape to more generative AI applications definitely requires social scientists and analysts to up their game though to learn a new set of tools. I do have another book in the works to address that, so hopefully you will see that early next year.

Advice for crime analyst to break into data science

I recently received a question about a crime analyst looking to break into data science. Figured it would be a good topic for my advice in a blog post. I have written many resources over the years targeting recent PhDs, but the advice for crime analysts is not all that different. You need to pick up some programming, and likely some more advanced tech skills.

For background, the individual had SQL + Excel skills (which many analysts may just have Excel). Vast majority of analyst roles, you should be quite adept at SQL. But just SQL is not sufficient for even an entry level data science role.


For entry data science, you will need to demonstrate competency in at least one programming language. The majority of positions will want you to have python skills. (I wrote an entry level python book exactly for someone in your position.)

You likely will also need to demonstrate competency in some machine learning or using large language models for data science roles. It used to be Andrew Ng’s courses were the best recommendation (I see he has a spin off DeepLearningAI now). So that is second hand though, I have not personally taken them. LLMs are more popular now, so prioritizing learning how to call those APIs, build RAG systems, prompt engineering I think is going to make you slightly more marketable than traditional machine learning.

I have personally never hired anyone in a data science role without a masters. That said, I would not have a problem if you had a good portfolio. (Nice website, Github contributions, etc.)

You should likely start just looking and applying to “analyst” roles now. Don’t worry about if they ask for programming you do not have experience in, just apply. Many roles the posting is clearly wrong or totally unrealistic expectations.

Larger companies, analyst roles can have a better career ladder, so you may just decide to stay in that role. If not, can continue additional learning opportunities to pursue a data science career.

Remote is more difficult than in person, but I would start by identifying companies that are crime analysis adjacent (Lexis Nexis, ESRI, Axon) and start applying to current open analyst positions.

For additional resources I have written over the years:

The alt-ac newsletter has various programming and job search tips. THe 2023 blog post goes through different positions (if you want, it may be easier to break into project management than data science, you have a good background to get senior analyst positions though), and the 2025 blog post goes over how to have a portfolio of work.

Cover page, data science for crime analysis with python

I translated my book for $7 using openai

The other day an officer from the French Gendarmerie commented that they use my python for crime analysis book. I asked that individual, and he stated they all speak English. But given my book is written in plain text markdown and compiled using Quarto, it is not that difficult to pipe the text through a tool to translate it to other languages. (Knowing that epubs under the hood are just html, it would not suprise me if there is some epub reader that can use google translate.)

So you can see now I have available in the Crime De-Coder store four new books:

ebook versions are normally $39.99, and print is $49.99 (both available worldwide). For the next few weeks, can use promo code translate25 (until 11/15/2025) to purchase epub versions for $19.99.

If you want to see a preview of the books first two chapters, here are the PDFs:

And here I added a page on my crimede-coder site with testimonials.

As the title says, this in the end cost (less than) $7 to convert to French (and ditto to convert to Spanish).

Here is code demo’ing the conversion. It uses OpenAI’s GPT-5 model, but likely smaller and cheaper models would work just fine if you did not want to fork out $7. It ended up being a quite simple afternoon project (parsing the markdown ended up being the bigger pain).

So the markdown for the book in plain text looks like this:

It ends up that because markdown uses line breaks to denote different sections, that ends up being a fairly natural break to do the translation. These GenAI tools cannot repeat back very long sequences, but a paragraph is a good length. Long enough to have additional context, but short enough for the machine to not go off the rails when trying to just return the text you input. Then I just have extra logic to not parse code sections (that start/end with three backticks). I don’t even bother to parse out the other sections (like LaTeX or HTML), and I just include in the prompt to not modify those.

So I just read in the quarto document, split by “”, then feed in the text sections into OpenAI. I did not test this very much, just use the current default gpt-5 model with medium reasoning. (It is quite possible a non-reasoning smaller model will do just as well. I suspect the open models will do fine.)

You will ultimately still want someone to spot check the results, and then do some light edits. For example, here is the French version when I am talking about running code in the REPL, first in English:

Running in the REPL

Now, we are going to run an interactive python session, sometimes people call this the REPL, read-eval-print-loop. Simply type python in the command prompt and hit enter. You will then be greeted with this screen, and you will be inside of a python session.

And then in French:

Exécution dans le REPL

Maintenant, nous allons lancer une session Python interactive, que certains appellent le REPL, boucle lire-évaluer-afficher. Tapez simplement python dans l’invite de commande et appuyez sur Entrée. Vous verrez alors cet écran et vous serez dans une session Python.

So the acronym is carried forward, but the description of the acronym is not. (And I went and edited that for the versions on my website.) But look at this section in the intro talking about GIS:

There are situations when paid for tools are appropriate as well. Statistical programs like SPSS and SAS do not store their entire dataset in memory, so can be very convenient for some large data tasks. ESRI’s GIS (Geographic Information System) tools can be more convenient for specific mapping tasks (such as calculating network distances or geocoding) than many of the open source solutions. (And ESRI’s tools you can automate by using python code as well, so it is not mutually exclusive.) But that being said, I can leverage python for nearly 100% of my day to day tasks. This is especially important for public sector crime analysts, as you may not have a budget to purchase closed source programs. Python is 100% free and open source.

And here in French:

Il existe également des situations où les outils payants sont appropriés. Les logiciels statistiques comme SPSS et SAS ne stockent pas l’intégralité de leur jeu de données en mémoire, ils peuvent donc être très pratiques pour certaines tâches impliquant de grands volumes de données. Les outils SIG d’ESRI (Système d’information géographique) peuvent être plus pratiques que de nombreuses solutions open source pour des tâches cartographiques spécifiques (comme le calcul des distances sur un réseau ou le géocodage). (Et les outils d’ESRI peuvent également être automatisés à l’aide de code Python, ce qui n’est pas mutuellement exclusif.) Cela dit, je peux m’appuyer sur Python pour près de 100 % de mes tâches quotidiennes. C’est particulièrement important pour les analystes de la criminalité du secteur public, car vous n’avez peut‑être pas de budget pour acheter des logiciels propriétaires. Python est 100 % gratuit et open source.

So it translated GIS to SIG in French (Système d’information géographique). Which seems quite reasonable to me.

I paid an individual to review the Spanish translation (if any readers are interested to give me a quote for the French version copy-edits, would appreciate it). She stated it is overall very readable, but just has many minor things. Here is a a sample of suggestions:

Total number of edits she suggested were 77 (out of 310 pages).

If you are interested in another language just let me know. I am not sure about translation for the Asian languages, but I imagine it works OK out of the box for most languages that are derivative of Latin. Another benefit of self-publishing, I can just have the French version available now, but if I am able to find someone to help with the copy-edits I will just update the draft after I get their feedback.